Evolution

This is not anything to do with Darwin but looks at how ideas and definitions evolve in light of new input with ideas, theories or discoveries.

I created Reality of Illness to show how much current support and evidence there is to refute germ theory. I still hope this will open the eyes of more people to just how wrongly the medical and pharmaceutical industry currently presents and pursues reasons for illness.

However the problem (if you can call it a problem) is that the actual reality of illness gets broader the further you go along the correct path and the more people you discover to be having more sensible and scientifically-backed theories.

In science everything starts as a theory. You then try to see if it can be confirmed by observation and experiment as my hero Richard Feynman explained here long ago:

Note: If it disagrees with experiment it’s WRONG! This is why we know colds and flu are not caused by germs and are not contagious — because 200 experiments tell us this very clearly. See Roytas.

So what happens is that the terrain model having the refutation of germ theory at its core quickly expands to ask: ‘If not germs then what exactly?’

Your ‘terrain’ is currently a fairly broad brush describing the stuff in your life that is around you, can affect you or could get into you. So your life experience and your environment if you like.

And if germs aren’t making us ill we have try and figure out was is.

The trouble is, because the medical profession has been hitherto and possibly deliberately barking up the wrong tree with germs, the research into anything else looking for the real causes is still somewhat immature.

And it certainly isn’t in the medical profession’s interests to look for better reasons for illness because they have a vested interest and very profitable business model based on germ-theory. Added to which admitting they are wrong about germs would be a tad embarrassing.

Very obviously vaccines and the damage they do is increasingly seen as a big factor in causing much more than they cure or prevent. This is simply due to their ability to directly deliver toxic gloop into the body bypassing all our normal defences along with the fact that vaccines are built around the false notion of germs being the bad guys.

But a huge and increasing part of the puzzle (or let’s call it the bigger picture) is the role of the body in trying to then deal with this or any other toxic assault?

Toxins clearly don’t only arrive only as stuff in vaccine injections. They can arrive via other meds, environmentally by things in the air we breathe, unseen as radiation or via everyday chemicals we come into contact with.

But a very large part is the poison that forms part of the current western diet of processed food containing radically new ingredients that didn’t exist a few decades ago.

Our bodies are needing to evolve very quickly to try and deal with stuff they never previously knew.

Seeing the body react and trying to interpret that response is a huge challenge because we are all different, the toxic inputs are different and the body mechanisms are hugely complex and still often little understood.

And let’s not forget other things that can play a part too like our outlook and demeanour. Something as simple as our positivity can make a big difference but it will always remain impossible to account for in any control experiments.

Yesterday I added Dr Patrick Coles to the Reality of Illness website directory after seeing a video of him talking about his view of cancer with Dr Andrew Kaufman here.

In my view his thoughts take the thinking of Professor Thomas Seyfried a stage further and it is definitely worthy of people’s consideration.

During the process of evolving a better understanding of illness, some things might end up being as wrong as germ theory. But better theories certainly need to be investigated thoroughly until they can be accepted or rejected.

And certainly the mainstream thinking on cancer appears to be as wrong as germ theory.